now playing
The Truth About Nutrition: How You Can Take a Science-Based Approach | Bradley Johnston PhD
Episode 141, duration 1 hr 31 mins
Episode 141
The Truth About Nutrition: How You Can Take a Science-Based Approach | Bradley Johnston PhD
Misinformation in nutrition is rampant. From demonizing red meat to hyping plant-based diets, conflicting advice has left many people confused about what’s truly evidence-based. In this episode, I am joined by Dr. Bradley Johnston, an expert in evidence-based nutrition and public health policies, to separate fact from fiction. With nearly 200 peer-reviewed publications, Dr. Johnston has challenged conventional wisdom—including recommendations from major organizations like the World Health Organization. He shares how evidence-based practices should guide our dietary choices, the importance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and how cognitive biases influence the research we trust.
Key Points:
- How evidence-based guidelines are formed—and why they sometimes change
- The three pillars of evidence-based practice and why patient values matter
- Why most nutrition studies aren’t as strong as we think—and how to critically evaluate them
- What the best available research actually says about dietary patterns for longevity
- The role of AI in research and whether it’s a help or hindrance to scientific rigor
Who is Dr. Bradley Johnston?
Dr. Bradley Johnston is an Associate Professor at Texas A&M University, specializing in evidence-based nutrition, and the methodology of patient-reported outcomes, randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and clinical and public health practice guidelines. With a PhD in experimental medicine from the University of Alberta and post-doctoral training in evidence-based practice, epidemiology and biostatistics from Oxford and McMaster University, his research focuses on advancing human health research methodology to improve clinical and dietary practice recommendations and public health policies. He co-leads EvidenceBasedNutrition.org and NutriRECS, develops nutrition education resources (e.g. Nutrition Users’ Guides), and currently serves as Co-Chair of the Canadian Pediatric Obesity Management Guidelines, ensuring clinical and public health guidelines are backed and transparently supported by the best available evidence, including end user values and preferences, absolute estimates of effect and the certainty of evidence for estimates of effect.
In this episode, we discuss:
– How evidence-based guidelines are formed—and why they sometimes change
– The three pillars of evidence-based practice and why patient values matter
– Why most nutrition studies aren’t as strong as we think—and how to critically evaluate them
– What the best available research actually says about dietary patterns for longevity
– The role of AI in research and whether it’s a help or hindrance to scientific rigor
Thirty-One to Zero: What the Testosterone Gap Means for Women
For decades, the question about testosterone in women was whether it mattered at all. That question is closed. The real question is why the FDA has approved roughly thirty-one testosterone products for men and exactly zero for women. I put that question to Dr. Susan Read More...
The Pentagon’s Testosterone Memo: What It Says, and Why Military Medicine Is Playing Catch Up
The military community is buzzing right now about a recent Department of War memo and so is much of the medical community. Based on the wildly different interpretations, I wanted to have an open and honest conversation about the memo with someone who had the Read More...
The Variable Almost Nobody Trains: Your Autonomic Nervous System, and Why It May Be Aging You
The world, Kristen Holmes told me, quietly splits into two kinds of people: those who can steer their own autonomic nervous system, and those who get steered by it. The first group does not just carry a competitive edge. In her words, they carry a Read More...
